Throughout my 17+ years with the Huge “I,” I did numerous media interviews. I’d at all times cringe when our communications division would ask me to speak to a author doing an article about how to save cash on automotive insurance. As if we want one other article to hitch the 15,200,000+ articles that exist already. They usually all present the identical recommendation.
They usually all (just about) say NOTHING in regards to the variations in protection between insurance policies or the claims practices of the carriers. So, why is that this? My guess is that stating the reality, that purchasing insurance is just not merely a matter of few ideas or tips, lessens the worth of their articles. The fact is that articles of this kind are harmful and a disservice to shoppers. This ignorant, simple-minded method jeopardizes the monetary solvency of American households.
For instance, the article cited above says:
“Procuring round pays, too. In California, a driver combining owners and auto insurance policies may save about $1,900, on common, by signing up with Geico vs. Nationwide.”
Is the protection in each insurance policies similar or does the Nationwide coverage present superior protection and/or claims service? I don’t know, however I do know that, except you contemplate such variations, you’ll be able to’t say that the alleged $1,900 financial savings is price it. It could be for some individuals however not for others. And this suggestion doesn’t take into consideration that there may very well be different insurers with much better protection in the identical value vary.
As I started to put in writing this text, I bought an e-mail from Tim Dodge at IIABNY. A member agent’s insured borrowed a vendor’s automotive whereas her automotive was being repaired. She had an accident damaging the auto. ISO’s PAP Half D insuring settlement says:
“We pays for direct and unintended loss to ‘your coated auto’ or any ‘non-owned auto’, together with their tools, minus any relevant deductible proven within the Declarations.”
Whereas ISO’s personal coverage has an extra Different Insurance coverage clause which may be problematic (see this weblog put up), her coverage was not an ISO kind. Her coverage says:
“We pays for direct and unintended loss to your coated auto, together with its tools, minus any relevant deductible proven within the Declarations. Your coated auto doesn’t embody any car whereas used as a brief substitute for a car you personal which is out of regular use due to its breakdown, restore, servicing, loss or destruction.”
Discover the coverage language variations? There may be solely bodily injury protection for declared autos, much like some motorbike and boat insurance policies. Not offering protection for nonowned autos is a HUGE protection hole.
That is one thing some of these articles by no means point out as a result of the authors don’t perceive it and look at auto insurance as a commodity the place the one distinction is value. So, they focus their total consideration, and that of their readers, on the way to cut back that value, no matter whether or not the protection itself may also be impaired. One can find the identical sort of irresponsible journalism in lots of in any other case respected publications.
Notice: Please scroll all the way down to view feedback about this put up.
Photograph by rstrawser